Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Just read through the entire chain a few times again. There is a lot of weirdness that as gone on in this game that I hope the other townies are watching. I'm going to post some more once we get to night 1.
I am ok with my vote. EAP seems more likely to be Mafia to me.
there are 8 pages that is more than enough to go on in day 1. you are just trying to find a way out by getting viking and CSTNZ to post more. I feel much more comfortable voting you off than the other 2.
Could you quote what you would like me to answer? If it's bacon asking for me to be inspected: I understand his suspicion since I have posted a lot so that's really all I have to say,
Can we move forward? It's the same people posting so it's kind of pointless now.
Post by popsicle sarah on Mar 25, 2012 20:18:55 GMT -5
Ok, I just read through the whole thread. Lots of voting in circles which will be less confusing once I get a spreadsheet going. I'm not going to spend any time on it at this point in case the mafia kill me.
I have a couple of hunches, but after what happened during my last game when I shared a hunch that turned out to be incorrect, I think I'll hold my tongue for now and see who the Mafia whack tonight.
Just checking in. Its been a rather busy weekend for me. This is honestly the second or third time all weekend I've been at a computer.
All I can say is that the first round these last two games have been nightmares. People are trying to make something out of nothing, and the kicker is everyone but the Inspector and the Mafia are doing it blindly. If there are Townies stirring up the mess its very easy for Mafia to blend right in, or even sit back and watch it unfold.
Ok. I would like SFA to check in before considering closing the votes.
I'm here. I said my piece. I think EAP is probably innocent but it doesn't seem like others agree with me. I don't have enough info on the 3 of them to really suggest who would be the best choice to vote off.
If someone has any ideas I'm open to a possible vote change but as it stands changing my vote is a pretty empty gesture.
Just checking in. Its been a rather busy weekend for me. This is honestly the second or third time all weekend I've been at a computer.
All I can say is that the first round these last two games have been nightmares. People are trying to make something out of nothing, and the kicker is everyone but the Inspector and the Mafia are doing it blindly. If there are Townies stirring up the mess its very easy for Mafia to blend right in, or even sit back and watch it unfold.
or even you duddits. you said you voted for me b/c of this....but look at my response, does that not appease you?
This is weaksauce, but it is all I really have to go on right now. EAP was the first to request a 3 person runoff, as soon as she was voted for by bacon and became the 2nd potential in a 2 person runoff (with SFA). I know that lots of players request and see the benefit of having a 3 person versus a 2 person runoff, even in Day 1. However, I feel that it eases the ability for Mafia to separate from each other in their votes.
Duddits >>> EAP
yeah....you realize i did this so that there would be less of a chance of myself being voted off. the more people in the runoff, the better chance i have.
now if i wasn't in the runoff and suggested adding others, than that would be a little sketch.
woah woah. This is what I get for sticking up for you before? It's pretty much the only reason I got put into the runoff, and I really don't think i've been doing anything suspicious since. Viking stacked on you in the first place, why would you vote for me?
woah woah. This is what I get for sticking up for you before? It's pretty much the only reason I got put into the runoff, and I really don't think i've been doing anything suspicious since. Viking stacked on you in the first place, why would you vote for me?
Because it doesn't put you in trouble but evens things out between the other two. I'd like to see what others choose to do. If I feel that letting EAP live is just going to muddy the water later on I might switch back to her.
Okay. The way I feel is that nobody in this runoff seems suspicious. The only thing I ever thought was sketchy was viking stacking on you early on. I voted for EAP just to protect myself and she's since moved off me. I guess I wouldn't be totally opposed to changing my vote, but I'll have to go back and re-read things first.
^ so you wouldn't be willing to let me stay around another round by changing your vote to viking?
I don't want to vote for you or viking. My vote stands for CST and I kinda hope some more people change to him like SFA did. He's not more suspicious, but he's not less suspicious than you or viking. I don't necessarily think he's mafia, but I get a pretty strong feeling that you and viking are townies.
Cuz it was a lucky start to the game last time, and I don't feel like waiting anymore
Okay. So this is where my suspicion of viking began. I never really got the whole "good luck" aspect of it, especially for someone who usually is meticulous about this game. If you really wanted to get things moving, you could have put any other player in the runoff, one who, as I stated before, wasn't a potential threat to the mafia.
So after I pointed that you put a player the mafia would typically want in the runoff into the runoff, you put ME into the runoff, setting me up to try and make me look guilty of something.
Hey. The mafia lost for the first game since mafia 38 last game. We got surf by luck in the first round. Keeping with what helped win, I am moving off Phi.
I never intended to vote sfa in the runoff as you can see in my post switching to him. Think of the vote as not washing your hockey equipment in the playoffs. It probably does not help, but anything we can do to keep the townies winning this round is fair game.
I didn't notice this my first time around. This makes no sense to me. I don't understand how voting for SFA was your way of "keep the townies winning this round." You say you never intended to put SFA into the runoff, but how are we to know that if I never pointed out how strange your reasoning was, you would have moved your vote off of SFA. You NEVER said in your original post voting for him, that you had any intention of moving off of him. Also, after you changed your vote to me, you made a bunch of long winded and confusing posts about me not posting a lot in the last game early on but posting a lot early in this game, even though I explained my reasons for not posting in both of those respective games.
I don't know. It's not the most suspicious thing in the world, but upon looking back, I really didn't find anything too suspicious about EAP. I drew the comparison of her sitting back while me and sarah fought a few games ago when she was mafia, but I don't think that is what was going on when me and viking were going at it.
^ so you wouldn't be willing to let me stay around another round by changing your vote to viking?
I don't want to vote for you or viking. My vote stands for CST and I kinda hope some more people change to him like SFA did. He's not more suspicious, but he's not less suspicious than you or viking. I don't necessarily think he's mafia, but I get a pretty strong feeling that you and viking are townies.
Um would you explain what this means? If I'm just as suspicious as the two of them then why me? And why would you want people to switch to me? I feel I've been pretty straightforward this game. You had a hunch about me last time we played together and it ended up blinding us from the real mafia that was right in front of us. I think my playing style just makes you suspicious.