Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
By the way I fully expect to be killed tonight. Either because I am right and the mafia and scared of me or because I am wrong and the mafia use it to frame the various people I've mentioned. That's another part of my strategy. As a polarizing player I am distracting mafia focus from the inspector.
You see, this gets me. If you were really willing to stick your neck out there like that, and basically sacrifice yourself for the sake of the inspector (before you made this statement, I was totally expecting the mafia to whack you) only to say that mere minutes before we go into day 2? Now the mafia definitely WONT whack you.
Well SFA I'm not necessarily insisting you are mafia I'm just throwing ideas around now but it did still kind of at first look like you were trying to save viking. I still think that viking is more suspicious than EAP and don't think it was the right thing to switch.
You could very well be right. It might be a mistake on my part.
The way the game has already splitting up makes me think it's the lesser of two evils.
So theres no chance of you reconsidering that vote change? I think it's the wrong move. RDK made a lot of noise but honestly he did not convince me of anything.
I'm not convinced of anything. I think it's more likely that EAP and Viking are both innocent. My vote was based on the future of the game. I think keeping EAP alive at this point is more harmful because it's going to focus the discussion on her for another round etc.....
I dont think so. I have some theories on some people, but I'm not gonna talk about that stuff until day 2, so I think the conversation will definitely be fresh. The fact that we can only vote for these 3 people, all of whom most townies seem to think are all innocent (although I have my suspicions on viking) is really clouding our judgement and making us only look at these three people.
By the way I fully expect to be killed tonight. Either because I am right and the mafia and scared of me or because I am wrong and the mafia use it to frame the various people I've mentioned. That's another part of my strategy. As a polarizing player I am distracting mafia focus from the inspector.
You see, this gets me. If you were really willing to stick your neck out there like that, and basically sacrifice yourself for the sake of the inspector (before you made this statement, I was totally expecting the mafia to whack you) only to say that mere minutes before we go into day 2? Now the mafia definitely WONT whack you.
Well then you see what I was doing but didn't realize I was doing it on purpose.
P.S. We are not minuets away from day 2. We are minuets away from another run-off. That is unless you want to change your vote.
I'm not convinced of anything. I think it's more likely that EAP and Viking are both innocent. My vote was based on the future of the game. I think keeping EAP alive at this point is more harmful because it's going to focus the discussion on her for another round etc.....
I dont think so. I have some theories on some people, but I'm not gonna talk about that stuff until day 2, so I think the conversation will definitely be fresh. The fact that we can only vote for these 3 people, all of whom most townies seem to think are all innocent (although I have my suspicions on viking) is really clouding our judgement and making us only look at these three people.
And I on you, since it appears SFA was just busy at work. It comes down to this. Either one person voting for me has to change, or one from the other side has to change. Or sarah has to cast the last vote. I really don't think we need another runoff to decide this, but if it comes to that, then so be it. I am sick of getting ready to die though.
You see, this gets me. If you were really willing to stick your neck out there like that, and basically sacrifice yourself for the sake of the inspector (before you made this statement, I was totally expecting the mafia to whack you) only to say that mere minutes before we go into day 2? Now the mafia definitely WONT whack you.
Well then you see what I was doing but didn't realize I was doing it on purpose.
P.S. We are not minuets away from day 2. We are minuets away from another run-off. That is unless you want to change your vote.
I'm not the only person here who can change their vote to prevent a runoff. I'm also seemingly one of the very few who is somewhat confident in their vote.
Well sarah, as I've said before, I've thought viking was sketchy from the get go. Stacking on SFA for a questionable reason. In the past two games I've played, SFA was once inspector and was able to give us two mafia names (even though LD ruined it with his townie fake inspector BS), the other time he helped me see through EAPs fake inspector nonsense. He's good at this game. He is a valuable player, when he's a townie. Why put him in the very first runoff?
Then I pointed it out and he put me in the runoff for no reason, which even bacon commented he didn't originally understand.
Then he posted those statistics about who is more likely to be mafia, which, whether he wants to admit it or not, was an attempt at putting it in peoples heads that he is "less likely" to be mafia in a hard statistic manner.
Then he started posting about how I was posting way more early on in this game than in the last two, even though I explained why both times.
No, it's not a ton, but I really feel that it's a lot more than EAP ever did until she got put into the hot seat. Clearly she gets kind of emotional over this game (sorry EAP, not meant to be mean) and says things that are easy to twist into suspicious activity. Sarcastically saying she is mafia, nulling her vote, etc. It just doesn't add up, I don't get the evidence brought up against her. I think it's weak and I think that someone is trying to make her look guilty, and I think some townies are possibly getting convinced by it.
Well sarah, as I've said before, I've thought viking was sketchy from the get go. Stacking on SFA for a questionable reason. In the past two games I've played, SFA was once inspector and was able to give us two mafia names (even though LD ruined it with his townie fake inspector BS), the other time he helped me see through EAPs fake inspector nonsense. He's good at this game. He is a valuable player, when he's a townie. Why put him in the very first runoff?
Then I pointed it out and he put me in the runoff for no reason, which even bacon commented he didn't originally understand.
Then he posted those statistics about who is more likely to be mafia, which, whether he wants to admit it or not, was an attempt at putting it in peoples heads that he is "less likely" to be mafia in a hard statistic manner.
Then he started posting about how I was posting way more early on in this game than in the last two, even though I explained why both times.
No, it's not a ton, but I really feel that it's a lot more than EAP ever did until she got put into the hot seat. Clearly she gets kind of emotional over this game (sorry EAP, not meant to be mean) and says things that are easy to twist into suspicious activity. Sarcastically saying she is mafia, nulling her vote, etc. It just doesn't add up, I don't get the evidence brought up against her. I think it's weak and I think that someone is trying to make her look guilty, and I think some townies are possibly getting convinced by it.
I have explained all of this and I moved my vote off of you. You can keep posting though. For some reason, it seems like you really have a bug up your @ss over the way I play.
It does add up a lot more than your reasons for me do. Did you even pay attention to the last game?
So theres no chance of you reconsidering that vote change? I think it's the wrong move. RDK made a lot of noise but honestly he did not convince me of anything.
I'm not convinced of anything. I think it's more likely that EAP and Viking are both innocent. My vote was based on the future of the game. I think keeping EAP alive at this point is more harmful because it's going to focus the discussion on her for another round etc.....
I agree with what SFA said right there. I don't think EAP is mafia. I don't think Viking is mafia, but I have to choose one.
Sarah>>>EAP
I'm sorry EAP. I hope we're still friends after this
It wasn't because you voted for me it was because you moved off of SFA after I pointed out that it was odd that a townie would want to put SFA in the runoff that early.
I'm not convinced of anything. I think it's more likely that EAP and Viking are both innocent. My vote was based on the future of the game. I think keeping EAP alive at this point is more harmful because it's going to focus the discussion on her for another round etc.....
I agree with what SFA said right there. I don't think EAP is mafia. I don't think Viking is mafia, but I have to choose one.
Sarah>>>EAP
I'm sorry EAP. I hope we're still friends after this
sarah, at this point you have to look at this:
which is more suspicious? me defending myself or the way that bacon and RDK have gone after me and not said one word to viking at all.
i hated that the final vote would come down to you, b/c i know how much it stresses you out.
of course we are still friends, but i would urge you to reconsider before the hour is up.
I kind of agree with Phi. You fought the good fight, EAP, but it's clear that no one was going to change their vote, and sarah looked at what everyone said and made her vote, even if I think it may have been the wrong one.