Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I'm drawing a blank here. Can you remind me what he's done that was anti-LGBTQ? The pro-life part is obvious
I've found articles about how he signed an executive order to grant equal workers rights to LGBTQ, and he stated that he thinks they should get the same adoption rights as heterosexual couples
You are right, I was confusing the issue. I didn't realize it was the Supreme Court siding with the Attorney General to shoot down the equal worker's rights. Doesn't make it better though. He is still working towards getting equality for some, while trying to take away women's rights. I know that no candidate is perfect, but the abortion issue is the one of the platforms that is the most important to me.
Is religiousness a real word? I'm pagan, so I have no idea.
As per Dictionary.com:
right·eous·ness
/ˈrīCHəsnəs/
noun
the quality of being morally right or justifiable.
"we had little doubt about the righteousness of our cause"
Did you mean to look up righteousness instead of religiousness?
Also, yeah I absolutely hate his stance on abortion. Maybe it's his "deal with the devil" type concession so that he can stay in office. He for sure wouldn't have been elected if he was openly pro-choice
5.5/four tet, daphni b2b floating points, avalon emerson 5.12/neil young 5.19/mannequin pussy 5.21/serpentwithfeet 5.25/hozier 6.12-16/bonnaroo 6.28/goose 6.29/goose 9.17/the national + the war on drugs 9.23/sigur ros 9.27-29/making time 10.17/air
Biden stating that he will not legalize marijuana or change the laws around it because it's a "gateway drug" is the most infuriating argument for me. Because it literally is to push the buttons of old people who think that's how it works, while sipping a fucking vodka tonic.
Biden stating that he will not legalize marijuana or change the laws around it because it's a "gateway drug" is the most infuriating argument for me. Because it literally is to push the buttons of old people who think that's how it works, while sipping a fucking vodka tonic.
Pretty fed up with most of this field at the moment. These people suck so bad.
Quote me: Every drug that is not good for you that I've taken was fueled by alcohol not marijuana.
and cigarettes.
I'm adding for me nicotine already.. and ncbst3 has seen it before. I don't smoke nicotine unless drinking, -- the rest I'll keep low because I think we still have a no droog policy here --
Cannibus is fun; a medicine; might put your ass to sleep.... but what it won't do is get you anywhere past a psychedelic trip.
Post by Fitter Happier on Nov 17, 2019 23:17:44 GMT -5
We should really swap out all the alcohol in this country for hallucinogenics and see what happens. If weed is a gateway to psychedelics, then we might be okay.
We should really swap out all the alcohol in this country for hallucinogenics and see what happens. If weed is a gateway to psychedelics, then we might be okay.
If we were to have a substantive conversation about hallucinogens -- they shouldn't be legally available to anyone until 21 -- I was lucky enough only to have tried like a cap and feel it young. But your brain is better developed tripping later in life, it allows for actual personal assessment. You are a mess as a teenager. But it didn't stop me from drinking the shit beer and vodka given to me at that age of 17-20
I ascribe to the theory that cannabis can be a gateway drug in the sense that (currently, in illegal states) it puts you in contact with people who have other drugs to offer. It's not so much that weed makes you want to chase a bigger, better high - and if that addictive streak is already in you it doesn't matter what drug you start with - but that if you're visiting a dealer you're more likely to be in an environment where other drugs are available.
5.5/four tet, daphni b2b floating points, avalon emerson 5.12/neil young 5.19/mannequin pussy 5.21/serpentwithfeet 5.25/hozier 6.12-16/bonnaroo 6.28/goose 6.29/goose 9.17/the national + the war on drugs 9.23/sigur ros 9.27-29/making time 10.17/air
this is just a narrow view of the psychedelic era via one man's story, but it's worthwhile to remember that psychedelics, when abused, can have devastating consequences. personally i'm a proponent of the use of psychedelic drugs, even though i haven't taken any in 15 years. because of acid i know that butter is way better than margarine, etc.
luckily we know a lot more than we did in the 60s, and are learning more everyday. but bottom line these are powerful substances that should be respected.
You guys realize that the people claiming this was a U.S. led coup are citing leaked opposition audio tapes where someone mentions they have the support of Marco Rubio in the US senate? If you are so tied to your ideology that you believe Marco fucking Rubio is overthrowing South American governments I don't know what to tell you.
Bolivians protested for weeks and their military had the balls to stand by them. If you're celebrating the situation in Chile and upset about Bolivia for no reason other than "Left good, right bad" then that's a problem.
Do you guys think impeachment favors Trump or Dems, overall? Whether you agree with it or not.
I think overall it will cause hyper-partisans on the right to dig in their heels as many already probably have (had) their minds made up (for them). The right will continue to go further and further off the rails. One of their recent targets is Senator Graham who the idiots are saying hasn't done enough (Limbaugh, Dobbs, Carlson, etc.) to push bogus investigations. So their base will continue to be deflected and molded in the way they are told to think. Many on the left already have their minds made up as well. And more people are in favor of impeachment than not per 538's averages, but the responses are pretty much where you would expect the margin of error to be.
However, ABC News put out a poll today that said a majority of respondents actually favor removal of the president at this point. I'm not sure who all they canvassed out of the 506 people they interviewed (I think was the number), because that sounds awfully high. 70% in the ABC poll believe that Trump was wrong in pressuring a US Ally to pay to play for defense that we've already guaranteed them.
To answer your question, I don't really know. It's probably going to depend on what comes out in the public hearings, and apparently this is somewhat paralleling the Nixon impeachment where many people were extremely slow to believe he did anything wrong. If more and more evidence comes out that he fucked up royally, then I think it compounds the bad news. If they dodge and weave like they did in the Mueller hearings, they can probably hold onto a good bit of support like they did then even though they refused to answer most of the questions and also banned testimony and even at the direction of the DOJ wrote their own laws to protect him. At some point, Civics has to take over and the majority of the American people will have to see that this bunch is no good.
On a related note, the president went into the hospital due to some chest pains this weekend. I think one face saving way out for him is to quit (or not run in 2020) due to health problems. I only expect this if it happens early enough and he is convinced he's going to get pounced. Otherwise, he'll stay in and probably run a competitive electoral college race but lose bigger in the popular vote than last time (obviously depending on who wins the Democratic Primaries as they/we all pull from somewhat disparate constituencies on the center and left of the US Political Spectrum).