What are you talking about? Mike has hardly said anything about the matter. Viking, I think we can rest assured that LD means to vote for SFA. He hasn't checked in here in days and may not be back by tonight. Why drag it out.
I think someone is getting saved, and Hakuna probably isn't the one. There is so much attention on SFA right now, it might mean something. Could it be him? Could it be Mike trying to frame him?
I'm gonna put SFA in a second runoff just to get more of a clue.
This doesn't even make sense. How am I being saved? Because the person who originally voted for me and got me into the runoff switched his vote? Is that it? I can tell you it isn't Mike because Mike hasn't done anything to anyone.
This is going to be one quacking stupid runoff. Jesus christ.
Post by superfurryanimal on Sept 19, 2012 15:21:28 GMT -5
So basically I'm being voted for because I'm talking and actually participating LD? So should I just saying quacking nothing and get called out for being two quite. I guess your just Quacked either way in this game.
Switching my vote to Hakunah, this has been touched on previously, but I feel that SFA would be a more valuable player to the townies than Hakunah. It is also a little bit of self preservation because I like my odds against Hakunah over SFA in a two person runoff and I have no reason to believe that either one is mafia. And yes, I know I would need both LLL and LD to vote Hakunah as well, barring any further switches.
Also, touching on the Mike D has been quiet comments, I just don't see much at all yet that would lead me to believe anyone is mafia. We all know that the first round is the biggest crap shoot, the most number of players with the least amount of information. I am not going to be aggressive or incriminate anyone I don't believe is mafia or have any back up to it.
I need to pay more attention to the game. I been too busy on a bunch other crap lately. I think I said something stupid earlier about SFA. Between my NY adventure, my shiz job, and a gf who doesn't like it when I spent hours on the internet so keeps me off as much as possible... I probably shouldn't have played this round.
Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Sept 19, 2012 22:53:12 GMT -5
Well I've already outlined what I still find to be one of the most suspicious moves of the game thus far, which involved Hakuna putting Kiko into the run-off, only to take him back out despite multiple players saying that an SFA/Mike D/Kiko run-off would be good.
I was pretty sure SFA was getting the Mafia treatment here just because I don't remember him ending up in a run-off like that so early in the game, especially one that carries on to the next round. But now that he has been saved, and by someone he is in the run-off against (Mike D).... well now I'm not so sure.
Regardless, Mafia have the most influence at this point and they have apparently been satisfied with the results of the run-offs.
I'm leaning towards Hakuna. But I'd like to hear some opinions prior to deciding for sure.
Welp, I guess this is where I step in and explain my vote for Hakuna. A bunch (I'm not naming names) of people seemed to be complaining that the MikeD, Kiko, SFA runoff was just what the Mafia wanted and that they were all sitting around laughing at us. So I thought why not throw in a wild card and took Kiko out of it because he seemed to be the more likely not to be Mafia based on his newbness in throwing SFA into the runoff out of silly opening round voting methods. I have no idea who is Mafia but I figured I would help give the masses what they wanted - a shake up. So I shook it up. biznatch at me for doing it. Suspect me for doing it. Respect me for doing it. I don't really care. <Insert Tommy Lee Jones clip here.> But you can't have it both ways. Did I pick out a Mafia who was sitting quietly or did I save a Mafia who was caught in the runoff? HTF should I know? I'm sticking with my vote for Hakuna because I feel responsible for putting him in there but I have no inkling who is Mafia.