Post by LoveLuckLaughter on Sept 7, 2011 13:49:47 GMT -5
Weak for sure
A better reason would be: As per recent history, one of those two new players are probably Mafia, however it is their first game so we should let them get past the first round. That I could dig, I wouldn't dig it happily, but I'd at least be cool with it.
I was kind of hoping we'd see some more obvious vote stacking showing up in the runoff. With the votes this evenly spread, I have a feeling that all three of our runoff players are innocent.
This is the part of the game that I'm afraid I'll never get.
So is two a better number than three for a runoff? Or is it just that a 4/4/3 split is hard to read? Or is it just that I'm oblivious? Never mind. I think it's the last one. ???
This early on, I think three is generally better than two because it increases the chance of getting one of the mafia in the runoff. The reason I think we may not have gotten one in there this time is because the 4/4/3 split makes me think the mafia is comfortable with any one of these three getting killed off.